Archive for February, 2008

The NY Times opens the campaign by sliming McCain

Wednesday, February 20th, 2008

UPDATE # 5 Maybe the Times was really trying to influence a stockholder election and that would make more sense than any other explanation. I don’t know why anyone would want to invest a half billion dollars in that turkey but I’m not an investment banker.

UPDATE #4 This WaPo story tries to make a mountain out of a molehill and seems inconsequential. McCain chaired the Commerce Committee and had to deal with these matters. The final sentence of the story points out that the deal he is accused of trying to facilitate never happened ! More Democrat partisan stuff. Even the Times is acknowledging that the story has backfired. My sentiments are pretty well expressed here.

UPDATE #3: David Brooks now has a column about the McCain story and the last paragraph is ominous.

At his press conference Thursday, McCain went all-in. He didn’t just say he didn’t remember a meeting about Iseman. He said there was no meeting. If it turns out that there is evidence of an affair and a meeting, then his presidential hopes will be over. If no evidence surfaces, his campaign will go on and it will be clear that there were members of his old inner circle consumed by viciousness and mendaciousness.

UPDATE # 2: Bob Bennett, the lawyer who represented Bill Clinton in the Paula Jones case, was retained by McCain when he learned that the NY Times was working on this story. He was interviewed on Laura Ingrahm this morning. He says they answered all of the Times’ questions, provided lots of information that never made it into the story and the story is a smear job, pure and simple. He also informed us that he was the Senate Ethics Committee counsel for the Keating scandal back when McCain was a freshman Senator and was caught up in it. He reported to the committee that McCain was clear and should be dropped from the investigation. They choose to keep him involved to avoid having the Keating affair a pure Democrat scandal. The story is a disgrace, apparently published prematurely because The New Republic is coming out with a piece about the Times investigation. Note that the TNR story is about the Times not McCain. We have reporters writing stories about each other. Talk about politicians’ hubris!

UPDATE: The Senator has responded to the Times’ smear by simply saying “The story is not true.” His staff has released a statement of facts that points out he was acting appropriately as chairman of the committee that oversees the FCC which, in the Clinton Administration, was acting as though it would ignore clear Congressional direction. In other words, the Clinton FCC was the problem, not the lobbyist.

Well, McCain declared himself the GOP nominee last night and today, regular as clockwork, the NY Times is ready with the first smear. Of course, “anonymous sources” are prominently displayed.

Ethics. Shmethics.

On the other hand, maybe McCain is the source to try to win the “youth vote.”

Pakistan may be lost

Wednesday, February 20th, 2008

UPDATE: Obama’s chief foreign policy adviser appears to be clueless about the threats. This is not reassuring, folks. Remember, Obama is the guy who said he’d invade Pakistan.

The election just completed in Pakistan looks to be a victory for the Islamists. Bhutto’s husband, now leader of the majority, plans to abandon the war on al Qeada and “talk” to the Taliban. Mr. Zardari, known during Bhutto’s regime as “Mr 10%,” will not be an ally. The foolishness of pressuring Benizir Bhutto to go back to Pakistan is even more obvious. This is another failure for Condaleeza Rice and the State Department. Turkey is shifting toward Islamist sentiment. The wave of Islamism has not yet crested.

Better screwed than rude

Tuesday, February 19th, 2008

Mark Steyn, as usual, has a pithy view of the cultural collapse of Europe. More Eurabia.

Worries about Obama on the left

Tuesday, February 19th, 2008

There are growing worries on the left that Obama could be the next McGovern. Some of these guys were McGovern people so they should know.

The other John McCain

Tuesday, February 19th, 2008

This is a good interview with Jack McCain, the son of Senator and candidate John McCain. Also there are some good comments about the candidate’s stamina for his age. I’ve had my reservations about McCain and this personal look is helpful.

Health Reform IV

Tuesday, February 19th, 2008

This is not going to be the full story as I just don’t have the time right now but there are a few items that I will try to add as I go along. The fee-for-service system served us well until about 1950. Paul Starr’s book, The Social Transformation of American Medicine, does a good of of telling the history. We must remember that doctors were unable to do much to influence the course of disease until 1900. Surgery came ahead of medicine here and, by 1867, a surgeon did more good than harm in most cases. That was the year that Lord Lister published his revolutionary paper on the prevention of infection. In 1905, John B Murphy published a chapter in WW Keen’s American Textbook of Surgery that defined the condition of acute appendicitis and explained how to make the early diagnosis.

I had a patient one time whose appendix had been removed in 1905 when he was 15. He complained to me about the appearance of the scar. I told him to just be grateful for a surgeon in Denver (where he lived at the time) who knew enough to get him through.

By 1945, antibiotics, first sulfa drugs, then penicillin, had cut the mortality rate of pneumonia from 30% to 5% in England. In 1948, Waksman had discovered that streptomycin cured tuberculosis. That was as great a triumph as that of Fleming and Florey, who discovered and purified penicillin. Consumption (tuberculosis) was the great scourge of civilization dating back to the invention of agriculture. Now medicine could really do something and the value of medical care, as opposed to health care, was rising.

When I was a medical student in 1962, the coronary care unit was not a feature of medicine. The Massachusetts General Hospital did not have a surgical ICU. There were no total hip replacements and no coronary bypass surgeries. In 1967, one of the great heroes of medical care (and unknown) Rene Favaloro performed the first coronary bypass surgery in man. Five years later, when I was a cardiac surgery trainee, it was becoming a common operation and ten years later, there were 70,000 performed in the US. By 2002, there were 657,000 CABG procedures in the US in spite of the fact that an alternative procedure, angioplasty and stenting, had appeared. Technology was racing ahead of any attempt to control it. CABG made people live longer. Total hip replacement, followed by total knee replacement, made the life more enjoyable. The level of medical care intensified. Cost quickly followed.

Fee-for-service medicine had a fatal flaw once it was combined with health insurance. Health insurance appeared during the 1930s. In Dallas, in 1929, the school teachers contracted with Baylor University to provide health care for their members. This was the beginning. In the 1930s, California doctors formed a group plan to provide medical care in return for a monthly fee of two dollars. The hospital associations had already followed the Dallas initiative and formed Blue Cross. Both of these programs were in response to the Depression when people had less money to spend on health care and the concept of insurance became more attractive. When combined with fee-for-service, a serious problem resulted.

In the new system, the patient was not responsible for the cost of his own health care. The doctor had a relationship with the patient but, until about 1978, the insurance companies were passive partners. This was true for several reasons. One, Blue Cross was owned by the hospitals and Blue Shield was owned by the medical associations. They were non-profit corporations, different in each state, and the boards of directors were dominated by providers, doctors or hospitals. Large insurance companies had also entered the business of health care in the late 1940s but they dealt with large corporations that bought coverage for their own employees, or with unions that had coverage for members, paid by employers. The employers and union officers were powerful as customers. For years, little scrutiny was devoted to the details of the care provided and increased costs were handled by increasing premiums. High technology and an aging population would shatter this complacency.

The advent of Medicare in 1965 brought a new player to the table. Lyndon Johnson, in order to assuage the fears of doctors about government medicine, adopted the solution of Aneurin Bevan, who wrote the legislation for the National Health Service in England in 1945. Beven said “He filled their mouths with gold,” referring to objections of hospital specialists to the NHS. That link, by the way, has an excellent summary of the issue of single payer health care. Johnson followed Bevan’s advice and made physician compensation generous. That would not last and it aggravated the problems but, initially, everybody was happy with Medicare. By 1978, that impression no longer applied to the government which was seeing double digit inflation everywhere, including health care.

In 1978, a new program called Professional Standards Review Organizations, or PSRO, appeared and the government was funding what were called “Peer Review Organizations” to oversee Medicare. They were everywhere advertised as concerned with quality but quality was always measured by cost so the physicians were completely cynical about their focus. We were obliged to participate and we quickly noticed that they attracted many critics of fee-for-service medicine. Some of them had failed to find success in caring for patients so they sought bureaucratic positions, some were idealists and some were political zealots.

The honeymoon was over.

More to follow.

Previous posts on this topic are under “Health Reform” in the right side column.

Our future First Lady

Monday, February 18th, 2008

UPDATE: I’ve now heard that she is complaining about the need to repay student loans for their educations at Harvard Law School. I presume that means that she does not consider Harvard worth the money since they both could have gone to the U of Illinois Law School as residents at huge savings. That’s good to know.

I don’t think Obama’s election is a foregone conclusion but this statement by his wife, Michelle Obama, is revealing. They don’t like us very much, do they ? Americans, I mean. I guess I can understand it. After all she IS a Harvard lawyer.

Another death on the ACLU’s conscience

Saturday, February 16th, 2008

The deinstitutionalizing of the mentally ill in the 1970s followed directly from the ACLU lawsuits against committment of the mentally ill. This followed the movie, “One Flew Over the Cuckoo’s Nest.” That is a damn poor way of making public policy but that is what we have. Now we have one more murder to chalk up to the ACLU. Here is another such example. Mental health professionals worry about the effects. Still, nothing is done.The legal situation is chaotic. But still people, psychotic and their victims, continue to die.

Lord Acton meant politics

Saturday, February 16th, 2008

Lord Acton famously said “power corrupts”. He added, “Absolute power corrupts absolutely” but that is less important. Politics rarely finds a disinterested participant. Almost all people who enter politics, or at least remain there for any time, do so for reasons of ego gratification. That is not to say that such a person is incapable of doing good or even saving his country, as in the examples of Winston Churchill and Abraham Lincoln. Neither was a conscript. William Sherman was famously aware of the corruption of politics and refused multiple entreaties to enter. That biography is incorrect in one respect. It says He never commanded in a major Union victory. The reason for this error is well explained in Liddell Hart’s biography as he points out that Sherman consistently outmaneuvered his opponent, the very able Confederate general Joe Johnston. Johnston was forced to keep retreating as Sherman maneuvered, avoiding the bloody battles of that era. Johnston was finally retired by the Confederate leaders, a serious error on their part, and his appreciation of Sherman’s skill and humanity was such that he was a pallbearer at Sherman’s funeral in 1891.

Unfortunately men of Sherman’s caliber are even more assiduous in avoiding politics these days. The result, we see. On the national stage, a Republican Party that took Congress in 1994 on a pledge to cut spending and clean up government, was ousted from power in 2006 in a miasma of scandals and broken promises. The current token for reckless and corrupt spending is the practice of earmarks, extra-legal spending items inserted into legislation after it is passed to reward campaign contributers in the shadows. These earmarks are not law but they have resulted in directing government largess to favored companies and communities in a quid pro quo of favors and money. Members of Congress employ each other’s relatives, or their own relatives as standards on nepotism decline to undetectable levels. Richard Nixon was once attacked for having his wife work in his office. He was able to defend himself only by pointing out that she drew no salary and was thus saving the government money. Since those days, Congressional staffs have grown enormous and relatives adorn these staffs like plums in a huge pudding.

A reaction to the corruption has resulted in the formation of a group called Porkbusters. The group has been campaigning for appointment of anti-corruption Congressman Jeff Flake of Arizona to the Appropriations Committee of the House. The committee ignored this initiative and appointed a good-ol boy from Alabama who boasts of his earmarks for his district. Reaction has not been positive.

The appropriations committee came to a fork in the road, and they went in the wrong direction,” said David Williams, vice president for policy at Citizens Against Government Waste, which gave Bonner a low rating on its most recent report card.

Bonner’s reply ?

“One of my many goals in Congress is to ensure the people of south Alabama get a significant return on their investment in the federal government (taxes). I am here to offer assistance in helping — where appropriate — to return to the people of the First District the tax dollars they send to Washington.”

There you have it. I would add that local government is not rolling in the money that Congress dispenses but they are still capable of getting into trouble. This is a guy I supported for City Council in Mission Viejo, but once in office, he began to meet “new friends” and forgot who the people were who helped him to office. Now he hobnobs with LA Times reporters and rich developers. It is tough to resist temptation but we could hope for a few honest politicians.

Clausewitz once said “Laws are like sausages. The less you know about how they are made, the better you sleep.” I wish it were not so true.

Kids can’t read but they know about global warming

Friday, February 15th, 2008

Anyone who worries about the failure of public schools should be concerned about this bill, one more example of the interference by the legislature in the education curriculum. We have “Heather has Two Mommies” but graduation rates in California are among the lowest in the nation.Among the 100 largest districts, the lowest graduation rate was in San Bernardino City Unified district (42 percent), followed by Detroit (42 percent) and New York City (43 percent).But they’ll know about global warming and recycling.