Posts Tagged ‘election’

The energy president

Sunday, November 2nd, 2008

The Sunday political talk shows are all convinced that Obama will win the election. Who am I to argue with them ? Let’s say, for argument’s sake, that they are right. What will be the defining moment of the Obama presidency ?

The war ? The Iraq War is won. He might be able to sink the Iraqi government by withdrawing our troops precipitously, as the Democrats did in 1975 with South Vietnam, but Iraq is farther along than South Vietnam was.

The economy ? I think he will have a baneful effect on the economy as small business owners retrench in the face of sharply higher taxes and a hostile administration. However, the economy will already be in recession and that will be blamed on Bush. Hoover was still being blamed for the Depression in 1939 after years of misguided New Deal experiments.

I think the defining theme of the Obama presidency will be the energy crisis.

Coal provides nearly 50% of electrical generation. Obama plans to bankrupt the coal industry with carbon taxes. He will build no new nuclear power plants and his promise to “look at” offshore drilling will remain just that, a promise.

On nuclear power, Sen. Obama says he’s open to expanding nuclear energy, which now provides 20% of the nation’s electricity, as part of an effort to increase power sources that emit little or no carbon dioxide. But he also has said there is no future for expanded nuclear energy until the U.S. comes up with a safe, long-term solution for disposing of nuclear waste. He opposes the Bush administration’s plan for storing waste at Yucca Mountain in Nevada.

I predict that, by 2012, we will see nationwide rolling blackouts. A Third World level of energy production will be Obama’s legacy from his one term presidency.

Sen. Obama is also framing the climate-change debate in more explicit language than Sen. McCain. “We can’t drive our SUVs and eat as much as we want and keep our homes on, you know, 72 degrees [Fahrenheit] at all times and then just expect that every other country’s going to say OK. That’s not — that’s not leadership,” he told a crowd in Portland, Oregon, last month.

That is his energy policy. I am not the only one who thinks this.

Jeffersonian Says:
November 2nd, 2008 at 3:27 pm
I’ve long held that the success of the United States has been based largely on the fact that politicians have either lacked the hubris to attempt to micromanage things they do not comprehend or have just been plain unsuccessful at grasping the levers that would give them the power. This is the first time I’ve ever felt like we’re about to put into office a President who hasn’t successfully run anything but his own mouth, yet feels compelled to command everyone to act in a certain way based on some ill-conceived ideas of “social justice.”

We’re likely to be squatting in the dark a few years from now as a result.

Ralph Peters has a look-back at an Obama Presdency from 2012. Of course, that is only a prediction.

An election decided by issues

Tuesday, October 14th, 2008

There have been allegations that many Obama supporters are voting for him just because he is black. To study this question, Howard Stern sent out staff members to do man-in-the-street interviews. Listen to this and they should settle the question.

They agree that Obama supports the war in Iraq, opposes stem cell research and chose Sarah Palin for his VP.

No problem. On the issues, they are with him.

Obama, the organizer, and Hurricane Sarah

Friday, September 5th, 2008

Does this look famliar ?

Who does this look like ? Change the glasses and…

This has been quite a week. The Obama campaign continues to attack the experience of Governor Sarah Palin. The latest was comparing her to Senator Thomas Eagleton, the ill-fated VP choice of George McGovern in 1972. When it came out that Eagleton had been treated for depression, McGovern dropped him from the ticket and chose someone that nobody can remember anymore. The implication seems to be that Sarah should drop out, as well. Don’t bet on it.

In the meantime, Obama seems to be having second thoughts about his own qualifications.

But Obama was also worried about something else. He told Kellman that he feared community organizing would never allow him “to make major changes in poverty or discrimination.” To do that, he said, “you either had to be an elected official or be influential with elected officials.” In other words, Obama believed that his chosen profession was getting him nowhere, or at least not far enough. Personally, he might end up like his father; politically, he would fail to improve the lot of those he was trying to help.

So maybe it wasn’t all that great a qualification since he accomplished nothing and admitted it.

It’s going to be an interesting fall. Oprah is doing her best to add to the interest.

Also US Magazine ran a slime job on Sarah and it is paying a price. Of course, US is owned by Jan Wenner, a big Obama supporter.

Hurricane Sarah rolls along.

Thanks, Joe

Thursday, July 17th, 2008

Senator Obama is now saying that Afghanistan is the central front in the war of radical Islam (He didn’t say that last part) but how does he know ? When they held hearings on Afghanistan, he wasn’t there, and that was even before he started running for president.

For a guy who says that’s where the war should be, he doesn’t show up much. How do we now? Joe Biden told us.

But since joining Foreign Relations, Obama has missed three meetings on a “new strategy” in Afghanistan, a country he has never visited.

Obama was absent from a January 31 meeting this year, and also was not present for a hearing on Sept. 21, 2006. He did attend a March 8, 2007 hearing on a new Afghanistan strategy.

On Feb. 15, 2007, Obama also missed a committee hearing on U.S. ambassadors to Iraq and Afghanistan.

Well, he just knows these things. Lesser mortals have to study and listen to experts.

Obama is trapped

Friday, July 4th, 2008

UPDATE: Charles Krauthammer nails it.

In last week’s column, I thought I had thoroughly chronicled Obama’s brazen reversals of position and abandonment of principles — on public financing of campaigns, on NAFTA, on telecom immunity for post-Sept. 11 wiretaps, on unconditional talks with Mahmoud Ahmadinejad — as he moved to the center for the general election campaign. I misjudged him. He was just getting started.

Yesterday, Obama had two news conferences. The first was to discuss “nuances” in his Iraq policy.

Mr. Obama said at his first news conference on Thursday that he planned a “thorough assessment” of his Iraq policy when he visited that country this summer.

“I’ve always said that the pace of withdrawal would be dictated by the safety and security of our troops and the need to maintain stability,” he said. “That assessment has not changed. And when I go to Iraq and have a chance to talk to some of the commanders on the ground, I’m sure I’ll have more information and will continue to refine my policies.”

The second, called “an emergency news conference” by Charlie Gibson of ABC News, was to beat back the waves of rage from his defeatist left wing base.

[T]he Obama campaign scheduled a second news conference to try to clarify his remarks. “We’re going to try this again,” Mr. Obama said. “Apparently, I wasn’t clear enough this morning on my position with respect to the war in Iraq.”

He has no room to maneuver, at least before the election. The Democratic Part left wing, the people who gave Obama the nomination, are, in Churchill’s famous words, “decided only to be undecided, resolved to be irresolute, adamant for drift, solid for fluidity.”

The discomfort with all this is obvious in left wing blogs like Kevin Drum’s. The comments show how furiously they are spinning the Obama drifting and flopping about on policy.

The end game cometh

Saturday, April 26th, 2008

UPDATE: The Clinton supporters smell blood in the Bill Ayers story and there may be more there than we know.

Eleanor Clift has seen the first shivers in the Obama edifice in her piece in Newsweek. Could this be the first day of the end of Ozymandias ? Hillary’s wrath will be terrible to behold if she wins. I still don’t think she can beat McCain without the black vote and I don’t see how she gets it. Still, she looks like a hell of a lot more competent president than Obama would be. President Hillary with a wounded and bleeding Democratic Party is better than the Obama juggernaught to socialism.

You saw it here first

Sunday, April 13th, 2008

Today on Meet the Press, James Carville suggested General Zinni as a potential Obama VP candidate. You saw it here first.

The evolution of Iran

Friday, March 14th, 2008

The recent election in Iran is part of what an Iranian scholar calls a creeping coup d’Etat. The Revolutionary Guards are taking over as Iran becomes a military dictatorship. This might even be an improvement if these men are more rational then the clergy who seem to yearn for martyrdom. Whatever it is, it is not democracy.

Maybe this is evidence of sanity. Kissinger said at Davos, “the Iranian government has to decide if they are a cause or a state.”

UPDATE: Hugh Hewitt interviewed Robin Wright on her new book about the middle east, an interview worth reading. I may get the book, as well. It sounds powerful.

A new name in Massachusetts

Wednesday, January 30th, 2008

I noticed when this Republican came very close to defeating a Democrat with a famous name in a safe (D) seat in Massachusetts, in spite of opposition by the local paper including dirty tricks such as deleting comments on their blog. Shades of SFGATE.com\. The campaign was unbelievably vicious and good for him in being willing to take them on again.

Now he is showing just how courageous he is by declaring for the seat of John Kerry. I think it’s terrific and I have already sent him a donation.

This story is another example of the left-wing bias of Google. Do a search and all the hits are antagonistic to Oganowski even though he almost won the election.

President Obama ?

Friday, January 4th, 2008

The results of the Iowa Caucuses last night bring the real possibility of a President Obama. This would also involve a Democrat Congress. What would be the result? Would we see political correctness arresting bloggers ? The British Labour Party has adopted “hate crime” laws so comprehensive as to make free speech a memory. The Democratic party is the party of hate speech laws.

What about taxes ? The Obama web site advocates raising taxes.  “Obama will protect tax cuts for poor and middle class families, but he will reverse most of the Bush tax cuts for the wealthiest taxpayers.” This, of course, is nonsense. The wealthy pay far more than half the total income tax revenues and they are the only group with the discretion to shift income or wait out the current administration by deferring income. This has happened before.

What about such major issues as global warming ? “Well, I don’t believe that climate change is just an issue that’s convenient to bring up during a campaign. I believe it’s one of the greatest moral challenges of our generation. ” I doubt he is interested in the Russians’ theories.

The latest data, obtained by Habibullah Abdusamatov, head of the Pulkovo Observatory space research laboratory, say that Earth has passed the peak of its warmer period, and a fairly cold spell will set in quite soon, by 2012. Real cold will come when solar activity reaches its minimum, by 2041, and will last for 50-60 years or even longer.

Foreign policy, of course, will be his weak spot. I don’t think he will be interested in Bill Roggio’s summary of global jihad. He’s probably not interested in Waziristan. If he even knows about this attack,  he probably considers it a coincidence. I don’t think President Obama wants to know much about the threats we face.

I am visiting friends in Britain. So far, the election has not come up as a topic of conversation. I know most of them don’t like Bush and would probably be thrilled to see a black US President. Beyond that, I doubt they consider how it might affect their lives. Interesting times we live in.