Posts Tagged ‘Obama’

Obama’s foreign policy

Monday, September 15th, 2008

UPDATE: He also knows economic facts that no one else knows. Amazing !

Lately, we have seen a number of members of Congress, perhaps anticipating a change in the administration, taking it upon themselves to conduct private foreign policy. Nancy Pelosi visited President Assad of Syria in spite of requests not to do so. It didn’t go very well, but she was undiscouraged.

After a meeting with Syrian dictator Bashar al-Assad in Damascus, Ms. Pelosi announced that she had delivered a message from Israeli Prime Minister Ehud Olmert that “Israel was ready to engage in peace talks” with Syria. What’s more, she added, Mr. Assad was ready to “resume the peace process” as well. Having announced this seeming diplomatic breakthrough, Ms. Pelosi suggested that her Kissingerian shuttle diplomacy was just getting started. “We expressed our interest in using our good offices in promoting peace between Israel and Syria,” she said.

Only one problem: The Israeli prime minister entrusted Ms. Pelosi with no such message.

Oh well. You can’t blame a girl for trying.

Potentially far more serious, is candidate Obama’s attempt to negotiate with the Iraqi government. Remember the alleged “October surprise” that had George Bush I supposedly asking the Iranians not to release the hostages before the election in 1980 ? Well, Obama apparently decided that he would try the same tactic, even if the other story was fantasy.

WHILE campaigning in public for a speedy withdrawal of US troops from Iraq, Sen. Barack Obama has tried in private to persuade Iraqi leaders to delay an agreement on a draw-down of the American military presence.

According to Iraqi Foreign Minister Hoshyar Zebari, Obama made his demand for delay a key theme of his discussions with Iraqi leaders in Baghdad in July.

“He asked why we were not prepared to delay an agreement until after the US elections and the formation of a new administration in Washington,” Zebari said in an interview.

Obama insisted that Congress should be involved in negotiations on the status of US troops – and that it was in the interests of both sides not to have an agreement negotiated by the Bush administration in its “state of weakness and political confusion.”

I guess he is that threatened by any progress in Iraq that he is actively trying to impede it. I wonder if anyone will care?

The OODA loop

Sunday, September 14th, 2008

I have previously commented on John Boyd, here, and am a fan of this man’s work.

The ideas of U.S. Air Force Colonel John Boyd (1927-1997) have transformed American military policy and practice. A first-rate fighter pilot and a self-taught scholar, he wrote the first manual on jet aerial combat; spearheaded the design of both of the Air Force’s premier fighters, the F-15 and the F-16; and shaped the tactics that saved lives during the Vietnam War and the strategies that won the first Gulf War. In addition, Boyd led the Military Reform Movement in the 1970s and 1980s, calling for radical change in Pentagon procurement procedures. A perceptive and original thinker, he synthesized ideas from across disciplines to formulate his own philosophy about warfare, competition, decision making, and the nature of leadership.

Many of America’s best-known military and political leaders consulted Boyd on matters of technology, strategy, and theory. His notions of time cycles and competitive behavior – known as the OODA loops (Observation, Orientation, Decision and Action) – have influenced not only military combat but also business models in the U.S. and abroad. Yet despite Boyd’s influence within the military and in variety of professional circles, he published nothing, preferring military briefings as his medium.

In the Mind of War, Grant T. Hammond offers the first complete portrait of Boyd, his groundbreaking ideas, and his enduring legacy. Based on extensive interviews with Boyd and with those who knew him as well as on a close analysis of Boyd’s briefings, this intellectual biography brings the work of an extraordinary thinker to a broader public.

That is from a review of another book about him and his influence on the military. Now, Michael Barone, an analyst of politics, has picked up on the OODA loop terminology of Boyd to describe the McCain campaign.

John McCain was trained as a fighter pilot. In his selection of Sarah Palin, and in his convention and campaigning since, he has shown that he learned an important lesson from his fighter pilot days: He has gotten inside Barack Obama’s OODA loop.

That term was the invention of the great fighter pilot and military strategist John Boyd. It’s an acronym for Observe, Orient, Decide, Act.

“The key to victory is operating at a faster tempo than the enemy,” Boyd’s biographer Robert Coram writes. “The key thing to understand about Boyd’s version is not the mechanical cycle itself, but rather the need to execute the cycle in such a fashion as to get inside the mind and decision cycle of the adversary.”

The Boyd story has many facets. He also pioneered the principles of fighter design that are still used by the Air Force.

Then team Obama and its many backers in the media failed to Decide correctly, so when they Acted they got it wrong. Their attacks on Palin tended to ricochet and hit Obama.
Is she inexperienced? Well, what has Obama ever run (besides his now floundering campaign)? Being a small-town mayor, as Palin said, is like being a community organizer, “without the actual responsibilities.”

Is she neglecting her family? Well, how often has Obama tucked his daughters in lately? For more than a week we’ve seen the No. 1 person on the Democratic ticket argue that he’s better prepared than the No. 2 person on the Republican ticket. That’s not a winning argument even if you win it. As veteran California Democrat Willie Brown says, “The Republicans are now on offense, and Democrats are on defense.”

Pretty interesting. Much more on Boyd here.

The Plagiarizers

Wednesday, September 10th, 2008

UPDATE: Even the Washington Post has noticed the plagiarism.

Joe Biden is well known for several incidents of plagiarism in his career. One was in law school, when he submitted a paper largely copied from a law review article. The other was his use of a British Labour politician’s speeches, even including a bit of phony life story, in his 1988 presidential campaign. Now, his running mate, Barack Obama has shown that they agree on plagiarism as well as politics.

Look at this cartoon.

Then look at Obama’s “lipstick-on-a-pig” speech.

Looks like plagiarism to me. Maybe he is getting desperate.

The Decline of the Mainstream Press.

Saturday, September 6th, 2008

Andrew Sullivan has damaged the brand of the Atlantic Monthly, an old and formerly respectable magazine. This cover is a parody but suggests what he has done. I used to read his blog and even contributed to it. I wonder a bit if he is an example of AIDS dementia as he has been HIV positive a long time and his behavior was quite circumspect until about three years ago.

I suppose this would be considered empathy for Andrew. He needs his medications adjusted.

Here is the story of his latest smear. It didn’t even last one news cycle before being debunked. Ace of Spades has more to say, although some of it is not safe for pre-teens.

A British view of the rage convulsion of the left after Palin was nominated. Note also the commenter linking to the discredited smear of Palin. It will continue until November 5 and then they will all explode. I can’t imagine the rage when this election is lost.

Biden has a Rezko problem.

Saturday, September 6th, 2008

We have not heard much about Tony Rezko the past month, what with the conventions and all. The fact that he is scheduled to be sentenced in October, and that this date has been pushed back, suggests that a plea deal is being negotiated. If so, Rezko may be back (well, actually for the first time outside Chicago) on the front pages just before the election.

Now, it turns out, his running mate, Joe Biden may have his own Rezko problem. More about it here. Here is the history of Biden’s house.

The property was purchased by Stephan J III & Mary Ann Pyle in 1979 for $ 450,000.
The property was purchased by Keith D Stoltz in 1991 for $ 350,000.
The property was purchased by Joseph R Jr & Jill Biden in 1996 for $ 350,000.
There are 2 homes on the property of over 4 acres.
The tax value is $ 525700. The address is 1209 BARLEY MILL RD, WILMINGTON, DE 19807. Use one of the online valuation sites and discover the value of the property.
View property details here.
Residence 1 is 6850 sq ft.
Residence 2 is 1900 sq ft.

Campaign contributions to Joe Biden from 3828 Kennett Pike, Wilmington, DE in 2007:
Keith Stoltz $ 4,600
Susan Stoltz $ 4,600
Jack Stoltz $ 4,600
Margaret Stoltz $ 4,600

Once again, we are not making accusations. However, where we come from, these transactions smell a whole lot like the Obama, Tony Rezko transactions.

Even one house, unlike McCain’s alleged seven, can get you into trouble.

UPDATE: Even the Delaware press is starting to show an interest.

Obama, the organizer, and Hurricane Sarah

Friday, September 5th, 2008

Does this look famliar ?

Who does this look like ? Change the glasses and…

This has been quite a week. The Obama campaign continues to attack the experience of Governor Sarah Palin. The latest was comparing her to Senator Thomas Eagleton, the ill-fated VP choice of George McGovern in 1972. When it came out that Eagleton had been treated for depression, McGovern dropped him from the ticket and chose someone that nobody can remember anymore. The implication seems to be that Sarah should drop out, as well. Don’t bet on it.

In the meantime, Obama seems to be having second thoughts about his own qualifications.

But Obama was also worried about something else. He told Kellman that he feared community organizing would never allow him “to make major changes in poverty or discrimination.” To do that, he said, “you either had to be an elected official or be influential with elected officials.” In other words, Obama believed that his chosen profession was getting him nowhere, or at least not far enough. Personally, he might end up like his father; politically, he would fail to improve the lot of those he was trying to help.

So maybe it wasn’t all that great a qualification since he accomplished nothing and admitted it.

It’s going to be an interesting fall. Oprah is doing her best to add to the interest.

Also US Magazine ran a slime job on Sarah and it is paying a price. Of course, US is owned by Jan Wenner, a big Obama supporter.

Hurricane Sarah rolls along.

Obama is now running against Sarah

Tuesday, September 2nd, 2008

UPDATE # 2: Last year, she was much more qualified. I wonder what happened?

In Alaska, Palin is challenging the dominant, sometimes corrupting, role of oil companies in the state’s political culture. “The public has put a lot of faith in us,” says Palin during a meeting with lawmakers in her downtown Anchorage office, where—as if to drive the point home—the giant letters on the side of the ConocoPhillips skyscraper fill an entire wall of windows. “They’re saying, ‘Here’s your shot, clean it up’.” For Palin, that has meant tackling the cozy relationship between the state’s political elite and the energy industry that provides 85 percent of Alaska’s tax revenues—and distancing herself from fellow Republicans, including the state’s senior U.S. senator, Ted Stevens, whose home was recently searched by FBI agents looking for evidence in an ongoing corruption investigation. (Stevens has denied any wrongdoing.) But even as she tackles Big Oil’s power, Palin has transformed her own family’s connections to the industry into a political advantage. Her husband, Todd, is a longtime employee of BP, but, as Palin points out, the “First Dude” is a blue-collar “sloper,” a fieldworker on the North Slope, a cherished occupation in the state. “He’s not in London making the decisions whether to build a gas line.”

In an interview with NEWSWEEK, Palin said it’s time for Alaska to “grow up” and end its reliance on pork-barrel spending. Shortly after taking office, Palin canceled funding for the “Bridge to Nowhere,” a $330 million project that Stevens helped champion in Congress. The bridge, which would have linked the town of Ketchikan to an island airport, had come to symbolize Alaska’s dependence on federal handouts. Rather than relying on such largesse, says Palin, she wants to prove Alaska can pay its own way, developing its huge energy wealth in ways that are “politically and environmentally clean.”

Well, that was then and this is now. Even the New York Times has changed its mind:

Where is it written that only senators are qualified to become President?… Or where is it written that mere representatives aren’t qualified, like Geraldine Ferraro of Queens?… Where is it written that governors and mayors, like Dianne Feinstein of San Francisco, are too local, too provincial?… Presidential candidates have always chosen their running mates for reasons of practical demography, not idealized democracy…. What a splendid system, we say to ourselves, that takes little-known men, tests them in high office and permits them to grow into statesmen…. Why shouldn’t a little-known woman have the same opportunity to grow?… [T]he indispensable credential for a Woman Who [sic] is the same as for a Man Who [sic] – one who helps the ticket.

That, of course, was from 1984.

ORIGINAL POST
A new development has appeared in the presidential campaign. Barack Obama has started to compare his qualifications for office to those of Sarah Palin. This is amazing. It began here. A left wing blog called Talk Left was running a pool on how long before Sarah Palin withdraws as a candidate for VP. The deluge of leftist slime seems to them to be too much for her to resist. I agree that it is disgusting but the left has seemingly transferred its hate of George Bush over to Sarah. Why ? Here is one opinion. A bit whimsical but with a good insight into the truth.

But she’s not a Democrat, which despite her va-va-va-voom appearance, means she’s not really a woman, which is one of the reasons we’ve spent the past four days since McCain unveiled her trying to tear her limb from limb. Just because she’s the governor of a state sandwiched between two obscure and unimportant countries, Canada and Russia, and spent more time in her first five minutes visiting American troops in Iraq than Evita Barry did during his entire Rainbow Tour, what could she possibly know about foreign policy? It’s not like she’s John Edwards or something.

So that’s why we’re having our Wellstone Funeral Moment at the moment. We mean well; we promised ourselves we wouldn’t go over the top with our outright loathing of the Neanderthals who preach “Christian” values while practicing Wiccanism and child sacrifice and who hate black people and gay people and want to destroy the environment just because they can, and want to amass more money than even John Kerry or Jon Corzine or Herb Kohl or Jay Rockefeller or Dianne Feinstein — the five richest senators — or Ted Kennedy or John Edwards or Nancy Pelosi have. That, usually, is the Kos Kidz’s job. Along with speculating exactly how Bush got from My Pet Goat to planting the depth charges that blew up the levees in New Orleans.

But sometimes the mask slips and you can see — whoops! — how much we hate you.

The new development is that Obama, himself, cannot resist the temptation to join the fray. He is supposed to be the presidential nominee, far above the concerns of a vice-president, which everybody knows doesn’t really matter. Why is he inserting himself, and even comparing himself, to her ? He was being interviewed on CNN, a friendly venue, when this revealing exchange took place.

COOPER: And, Senator Obama, my final question — your — some of your Republican critics have said you don’t have the experience to handle a situation like this. They in fact have said that Governor Palin has more executive experience, as mayor of a small town and as governor of a big state of Alaska. What’s your response?

OBAMA: Well, you know, my understanding is, is that Governor Palin’s town of Wasilla has, I think, 50 employees. We have got 2,500 in this campaign. I think their budget is maybe $12 million a year. You know, we have a budget of about three times that just for the month.

So, I think that our ability to manage large systems and to execute, I think, has been made clear over the last couple of years. And, certainly, in terms of the legislation that I passed just dealing with this issue post-Katrina of how we handle emergency management, the fact that many of my recommendations were adopted and are being put in place as we speak, I think, indicates the degree to which we can provide the kinds of support and good service that the American people expect.

Whaaat ?

Just for the record, Alaska’s FY2008 operating budget is $11.2 billion, and the state employs approximately 15,000 people. Those certainly aren’t huge numbers in federal terms, but they’re a good bit bigger than the Obama campaign.

What is he thinking off ? Maybe this. He has lost his cool and this will defeat him if nothing else will. He feels it’s necessary to lie about the qualifications of the vice-presidential nominee. Why ? Because she threatens him. The race has turned upside down.

What ever happened to Joe Biden ?

UPDATE: Here is a piece by an Alaskan about Sarah and her record as governor.

And here is “Sarah America” on energy.

The Palin firestorm

Monday, September 1st, 2008

UPDATE #2: My God ! a sensible Palin story from the MSM. I’ve been to Wasilla and it is actually a beautiful, upscale suburb of Anchorage. It should have become the Alaska capital in an initiative that failed in 1994, just before one of my visits to the state. It is ridiculous to have the capital at Juneau, which is hundreds of miles from the major population areas of the state. You cannot even get to Juneau by land ! The problem is the rivalry between Fairbanks and Anchorage. The Fairbanks voters will never allow the capital to move to Anchorage. A move to Wasilla, which is about 30 miles north of Anchorage and on the main highway to Fairbanks, was defeated in 1994. I expect that voters will learn a lot more about Alaska in the next few months.

UPDATE: Now she is a computer hacker, except it seems to have been completely legal. Cool !

The political left has gone crazy. Some segments have always been a bit that way but Sarah Palin seems to have tipped most of them over the edge. The first reaction, which was shared by a number of inside-the-beltway dinosaurs of both parties, was that McCain must have been desperate or senile to have chosen her. The inexperience argument seems a bit odd given the lack of experience of the candidate that the Democrats have chosen this year. Still, it has been tried. Some Democrats kept their heads and advised calm. Even they had trouble understanding the situation.

Third, and most important, voters don’t need our help to figure this out. In the end, they’ll be the best and toughest judge of whether or not Sarah Palin is ready. Back in 1988, the Dukakis campaign actually ran an ad against Dan Quayle. It didn’t work, and wasn’t necessary. In any case, Quayle had only himself to blame for falling flat on the national stage. By straining so hard to compare himself to JFK on the campaign trail, he practically wrote Bentsen’s famous line for him.

Notice no mention of how that 1988 election turned out.

The netroots, on the other hand went nuts. That’s why we call them nutroots.

Washington Monthly, a left wing magazine site that was run by Kevin Drum the past few years, has become a slightly less obscene DailyKos since Kevin left. They are still out of control. The entire site, the past 48 hours, has been hysteria nonstop. That is only a sample.

The result may not be pretty for Obama. This frenzy of anti-woman sentiment has caused one Hillary supporter to switch and that may be just the beginning. One accusation has been that the choice of Sarah was a crude play for the female vote. I don’t think so. I think McCain really sees some of his own instincts in her. He also may realize that it is time to move on to the next generation of Republican leaders. However, the furious and demeaning reaction to her pick may accomplish just that purpose.

Keep it up nutroots!

The Anchoress has the latest knockdowns on rumors, which have spread even to the London papers. I can’t imagine this will help Obama.

The Palin “Troopergate” scandal

Saturday, August 30th, 2008

UPDATE #2: Here is a list of all the left’s attacks on Sarah along with appropriate rebuttals. They have gone nuts.

UPDATE: This is my favorite comment about Sarah Palin so far:

Gov. Sarah Palin (soon to be VPOTUS) is known to hunt, kill, gut and eat her prey -GO Sarah!!!

Look out, Joe !

The left is frantic to find a handle on Sarah Palin, especially since her nomination has proved to be wildly popular. Expect to hear a lot about this story. Excerpts:

1. The brother-in-law trooper was out of control and threatening family members BEFORE Sarah Palin was governor. The investigation also began before she was governor. He was suspended but the union got the suspension reduced to five days.

2. Palin appointed Monegan, the Public Safety Commissioner, AFTER the Wooten story began.

First, the video accusation is that the Governor’s office has questionable reasons (meaning removing Wooten from the AST) for firing Public Safety Commissioner, Walt Monegan in July 2008. As we know, documented complaints from Palin about Wooten started prior to Monegan’s appointment… which Monegan may, or may not have been aware.
Yet Monegan was appointed by Palin. She is certainly within her rights to fire him. And if complaints were already lodged about Wooten to the immediate superior, Col. Julia Grimes, why did she need to pressure him to fire Wooten? Afterall, if Palin was going to “abuse” her power to get Wooten fired, why not direct that power over Grimes as the superior of the Troopers?

And if getting Wooten fired was her quest, why did she not take steps to do that in 2005 during the complaint period, instead of specifically stating under deposition she was staying silent in order not to put his job at risk? Not to mention the gap in time… why would it take her two and a half years to fire Monegan because of Wooten?

3. The reasons Palin fired Monegan were unrelated to the Wooten story.

Andrew Halcro, who was defeated by Palin in the gubernatorial primary, lists the reasons why Monegan was fired.

When Walt Monegan was appointed, he realized the deep problems at DPS including low morale, understaffed detachments and the lack of a funding commitment to a long term vision.

He also recognized, that along with the strategic plan his department developed and introduced just months ago, there needed to be a commitment of resources to follow through on the public safety needs for Alaskans.

“We want out employees to know that help is on the way; that we are planning to grow our staff to provide both the needed services for this vast state, and the appropriate training necessary to do it”, Monegan wrote in his 2008-17 Strategic Plan.

But the Palin administration wanted Monegan to go in another direction. They wanted him to cut corners on a budget that had already fallen behind over the last decade. Under Former Governor Murkwoski there was significant investment made to try and catch up with growing costs but Palin’s budgets have again started to starve the agency.

To make matters worse, the change to the state’s retirement benefit program adopted by the legislature in 2004 has had a negative effect on the departments ability to recruit new Troopers.

OK. You have to read between the lines here. This guy is the one who filed the complaint against Palin yet he lists the reasons for the firing and Wooten wasn’t one of them. Murkowski, the former governor and mired in scandal, is his hero. That gives a clue.

Monegan was fired because he refused to take another job in the administration once Palin realized he was not solving the problems of the Public Safety office. She offered to make him head of the Alcoholic Beverage Commission, in a job she felt he was better suited for. He refused.

The problem for Palin was that Monegan was vocal about his concerns about the growing problems in rural Alaska due to alcohol and drug abuse and recognized that the state needed to invest more in protecting the public.

She recognized that he was better suited for that problem but he turned it down. I have never seen a police agency that thought it had enough money.

This story will run for a while but the summary provided by Flopping Aces is the best source. Once again the blogosphere beats the MSM.

Of course, the left thinks it has a scoop. They should keep crooning these lullabies to themselves. Right up to the debate.

A catastrophic decision.

Monday, August 25th, 2008

Every once in a while, someone, in this case a candidate, makes a catastrophic decision, an “unforced error.” This seems to be one such occasion.

The ad is here. It says, “Barack Obama denounced William Ayres crimes.” The trouble is that he didn’t. Mayor Daley says Bill Ayres is a member of the “mainstream community.” In fact, he was Citizen of the Year in Chicago.

Ayers is still looking for that new symbol of hope to replace his old flags and signs. He could do a lot worse than to start with a photograph of him taken in 1997. It shows Ayers accepting Chicago’s Citizen of the Year award after securing the city a $49.2 million Annenberg Award for school reform.

“Makes you Citizen of the Year just like that,” Ayers says of the hefty grant, laughing. Shaking his hand in the photo is Mayor Daley — the new one, whose dad’s police treated Ayers so inhospitably all those years ago.

What did Bill Ayres’ father, a powerful and rich Democrat with connections to the Daley regime, want?

Of course, Tom Ayers was never going to run for mayor himself and clearly that was not possible for his son Bill. But what about the young charismatic Barack Obama? As I have suggested in earlier posts here it is possible that Tom Ayers served as a mentor to the young Obama as far back as the time Obama spent as a community organizer on the south side of Chicago not far from Tom Ayers’ home in Hyde Park. Obama biographer David Mendell writes that Obama “had returned to Chicago from Harvard Law with an eye on the mayor’s office after witnessing Harold Washington’s historic tenure at city hall.”

Tomorrow is the day that Steve Diamond and Stanley Kurtz find out what is in the Chicago Annenberg Challenge records.

For Obama to have opened this door for the MSM on the Ayres issue was an unforced eror and maybe a catastrophe.