Posts Tagged ‘Palestinians’

Europe may be changing its mind

Wednesday, January 14th, 2009

The European Union countries have been the principle supporters of the Palestinians since 1948. As noted previously, Arab countries contribute only 6% of the annual cost of UNRWA, which is the UN agency that has perpetuated the Palestinian camps. Other refugees have been settled elsewhere. Only the Palestinians, serving as a perpetual “victim” of Israel’s existence, have never been resettled. Now, Egypt and Jordan, which share borders with Palestinian zones, resist any effort of accept them for settlement, as I posted on before.

Now, Europe may be losing patience with the Palestinians, as it faces its own Muslim problems.

Europe was a Middle East counterbalance – generally sympathetic to Palestinians as the weaker party, critical of an unqualified US backing of Israel. The Palestine Liberation Organization had offices in Europe. France’s Navy helped Yasser Arafat escape Tripoli in 1983. Europe backed the Oslo Accords, and saw the Palestinian cause as a fight for territory and statehood.

Yet Europe’s traditional position on the Arab dispute has been quietly changing: It is gravitating closer to a US-Israeli framing of a war on terror, a “clash of civilizations,” with a subtext of concern about the rise of Islam – and away from an emphasis on core grievances of Palestinians, like the ongoing Israeli settlements in the West Bank and East Jerusalem, and “occupation.”

As Europeans witness violent anti-Israel rallies that burn cars and murder Jews who have nothing to do with Israel, they may be coming to see the serpent they have clasped to their collective breast.

Public support for Arabs is down due social tensions with Muslim immigrants. “Europe fears an Islamist threat, whether internal or external, and this has begun to change the overall views on the Israel-Palestine conflict,” says Aude Signoles of the University of La Réunion. “There is a general ‘Arab fatigue’ in Europe,” says Denis Bauchard of L’Institut français des relations internationales.

A Pew Global Attitudes poll in 2006 found that French sympathies were evenly divided (38 percent) between those sympathizing with the Palestinians and with Israel, marking a doubling of support for Israel and a 10 percent gain for Palestinians over the previous two years. In Germany, 37 percent sympathized with Israel – an increase of 13 points over 2004 and more than double those who supported the Palestinians.

This is a change and may be a sign that the Palestinians should become more realistic about their goals.

Palestinian refugees

Tuesday, August 5th, 2008

There is a civil war going on in the Middle East. No, it is not in Iraq. It is in the Palestinian territories, specifically in Gaza. Fatah members are losing the war to Hamas and they are fleeing. Where can they flee ? Why, to Israel, of course.

Extraordinary developments in Gaza have given a new meaning to the term ‘Palestinian refugees’. As the Jerusalem Post reports, fierce fighting in Gaza between Fatah and Hamas over the weekend, in which 11 people died and dozens more were wounded, resulted in 180 Fatah refugees fleeing from what they called a ‘war of genocide’ by Hamas against Fatah supporters. And where did they flee to? Why, to Israel, of course — which allowed them in and proceeded to treat 23 of them (some of whom were wounded by the Israeli army after they approached the crossing into Israel) in Israeli hospitals.

Have you read about this ? Of course not.

Free speech in France

Thursday, May 22nd, 2008

I thought I had previously posted on this subject but it must have been on another blog.  The story is  here except that James Fallows, a left wing writer for the Atlantic, took the Palestinian propaganda version as the truth. Here is another version of the story but it is still not the truth.

It is now widely believed among objective observers of the Palestinian story, few enough as there are, that the boy was never killed and the entire sequence was a propaganda film. A lengthy court struggle in France, pitting the France 2 network and its powerful supporters in the Chirac government, against a single web site owner, has resulted in the defeat of the TV Goliath by the independent David.

Phillipe Karsenty is a hero to all journalists and his improbable win should join the annals of great media stories.

It probably won’t. 

 
More here. This is a big story for Israel but also for all of us who care about truth.

The al-Dura affair

Sunday, March 2nd, 2008

UPDATE: The closing arguments are over. The verdict will come May 21. Karsenty got a fair hearing this time.

In 2000, Israel was dealing with the Intifada, Arafat’s response to the serious peace proposals negotiated by Bill Clinton as he was about to leave office. It was as good an offer as the Palestinians would ever have short of the annihilation of Israel planned by Ahmadinejad of Iran. Of course, Ahmadinejad’s plan would annihilate the Palestinians too. In the midst of this crisis an incident occurred that became the image of the Palestinian argument. A boy named Muhammed al-Dura was allegedly killed by Israeli bullets while crouching with his father behind a wall. The incident became a cause celebre for supporters of the Palestinians. In recent years, others have taken up the matter and published stories that doubt the original version.

Philippe Karsenty, a French TV critic who runs a web site in France, raised the question of whether the entire incident was staged by the Palestinian TV crew. He was then sued by France 2, the TV network that had run the footage and began the controversy. It was their crew who had filmed (or staged) the incident. They even obtained a judgment against him in spite of the fact that the French judge had refused to allow him to obtain the “out takes” of the film. Karsenty contended that a portion of the film, not shown on French TV, had shown the boy still moving when he was alleged to be dead. Maybe it was all a hoax. Outrage followed. I heard him interviewed on the Dennis Prager show about a year ago after the trial.

Karsenty appealed and last week that appeal resulted in a new trial that heard a ballistics expert testify that the event could not have happened as alleged by the French TV program.

This entire affair is an example of the dishonesty of the entire Israeli-Palestinian controversy. In 2000, the Palestinians had a unique opportunity to move beyond the 50 years of squalor they had been offered by their Arab brethren. They could have had 96% of everything they said they wanted. Dennis Ross, the Clinton negotiator, has written that there were venture capitalists ready to invest in the West Bank and economic success was there for the asking. The response was Intifada and the sort of dishonest propaganda that followed. Now the Washington Post is reporting that the Bush Administration has little leverage and the Arabs are turning to Iran. What they do not tell you, is that there is no US solution for the problem. Only when the Palestinians decide to join the 21st century will they achieve a solution. It is in their hands and the al-Dura affair shows that they are not clean hands.

Why Condaleeza will not be the VP nominee

Friday, February 15th, 2008

Yesterday, on the Michael Medved show, there was a discussion about John McCain’s possible choices for a VP nominee. Condaleeza Rice’s name was mentioned and supported by Medved who has been a supporter of McCain this year. At one time, I thought she had real political potential, not as president just yet but, perhaps, as a California Senate nominee. Alas, she has gone off the rails in several diplomatic ventures. One is Turkey where, for reasons that don’t seem sufficient, she has supported a turn to Islamist extremism.

The other is in Israel where she has been pushing a useless peace initiative between Olmert , whose approval rating in Israel is about 10% and who would lose any election held now, and Abbas who lost the only election he has ever held. Olmert is in office only because he knows better than to schedule an election. He botched the Lebanon war and will soon be retired.

What is she thinking of ? I have already commented on Bush’s support of more negotiation at this time. And again here. Maybe Bush feels he has to make a gesture but Rice seems to be showing poor judgment in her enthusiasm for this mistaken policy. If she wants a political career someday, she could return to California after Bush finishes his term and redeem herself as a candidate for the Senate. Right now, she does not show up well as an astute Secretary of State.

If McCain wants to choose a black VP nominee, an ill-considered (and far too obvious) decision he is unlikely to make, Colin Powell would be a far more astute choice. I doubt Powell wants the office, although it would put him a heartbeat from the presidency behind a 72-year-old president, and he is probably too old anyway. I suspect McCain will chose a much younger governor, possibly Pawlenty of Minnesota or Crist of Florida.

Harvardstan

Monday, January 28th, 2008

As long as we are discussing the dhimmitude of certain American institutions, what about this one? The Harvard Middle East Studies Institute produces a factoid that the 800,000 (or 1.5 million) residents of Gaza require 680,000 tonnes of flour per day to survive. So each resident requires almost a half tonne (or a tonne) of flour per day ? What do they do with it ? I thought they were starving. Let’s get our terms right, to begin with. A tonne is a metric ton or equivalent to 2200 pounds, more than an English ton which is 2,000 pounds. The article in the Boston Globe accuses the Israelis of a “stranglehold” on Gaza. With the residents eating all that much flour every day, maybe the Israelis are just worried about obesity.

Although Gaza daily requires 680,000 tons of flour to feed its population, Israel had cut this to 90 tons per day by November 2007, a reduction of 99 percent.

Let’s see. Ninety tons is 180,000 pounds or a quarter of a pound per person per day. Other sources put the average flour consumption at 350 to 450 tonnes per day. Any way you look at, it Harvard is putting out ridiculous propaganda, but then we knew that. The Harvard version is that it takes a ton of flour per day to ward off starvation.

What if Israel really did give back east Jerusalem ?

Tuesday, January 1st, 2008

Ehud Olmert recently proposed transferring the Arab sections of east Jerusalem back to the Palestinian Authority. The reaction ? Not what you might expect. Perhaps there is sanity among the Palestinians after all. Even after all the vicious rhetoric in the PA schools and newspapers and TV, , “If there was a referendum here, no one would vote to join the Palestinian Authority. … There would be another intifada to defend ourselves from the PA.”.

Hmmm….

A clumsy blunder

Wednesday, December 12th, 2007

The Secretary of State was once the subject of a boomlet for the presidential nomination after her boss’s term ends. That was back when it seemed she was going to do a good job. Lately, that boomlet has disappeared and what we see are clumsy statements that make her sound like one more State Department Arabist. The Palestinians had the opportunity for an historic peace in 2000 and Dennis Ross has documented that effort. Arafat turned it down and resumed the Intifada, only with suicide bombers this time instead of stones. Of course, Arafat has his apologists but what would you expect from the New York Review of Books? I was once a subscriber and used to chuckle over the singles ads in the back that stated “No Republicans.”

Condi would have been well advised to take Ross’s advice but there seems to be a never ending supply of wishful thinking at State and she has imbibed freely. I have previously posted my opinion of the Annapolis talks and they went nowhere.

What next ? That will be for the next Secretary of State to determine.