Posts Tagged ‘Ayres’

Where did Obama come from ?

Wednesday, October 15th, 2008

As it becomes increasingly possible that Barack Obama may be our next president, some of his past associations have begun to crop up in a few media outlets. The major newspapers have shown an amazing lack of interest in his associations and a few “progressives” have attacked such inquiries as “racist.” There has been more talk about “The Chicago Way” and I suspect we will hear more about that in the future. Here is a primer on Obama and The Chicago Way.

One data point is the 1987 Chicago Teachers’ strike that led to attempts at reform.

A 1987 teachers’ strike brought those two sides together to push for a reform act passed by the Illinois legislature in 1988 that created “Local School Councils” (LSC) to be elected by residents in a particular school area. According to Shipps, the strike “enrag[ed] parents and provid[ed] the catalyst for a coalition between community groups and Chicago United [the business lobby] that was forged in the ensuing year.” (The full story of this complicated process is provided by Shipps in her book.)

This battle between parents and the teachers’ union led to legislation and a “local school council” movement that was captured by the political far left.

The LSC’s were to be made up by a majority of parents and have the power to hire and fire principals thus creating a new power center in the school system against what both reform groups viewed as the bureaucratic and expensive school board, on the one hand, and, on the other, the teachers union. In my view these types of councils are reminiscent of the manipulative “community” bodies set up in regimes like those of Hugo Chavez and the Sandinistas – used to control genuine democratic movements such as trade unions. Dorothy Shipps argues, as I will suggest below, that there is an alternative approach that is genuinely democratic and possibly more effective in improving outcomes for students.

Here is where Obama enters the picture.

Active in the local control from below, on the “community” side of this effort, was Bill Ayers who had returned to Chicago in 1987 as an assistant professor of education at the University of Illinois’ Chicago Circle campus, after surfacing from the underground and earning his Ph.D. at Columbia. Another ally in this battle at the same time was Barack Obama’s Developing Communities Project (DCP), as Obama notes briefly in his Dreams From My Father. (See also, “Meeting on School Reform Halted,” Chicago Tribune, Feb. 19, 1988 at 3; and “Black Parents” A letter to the Chi. Trib. on Aug. 23, 1988 from a DCP member defending the 1988 local control reform bill) The DCP had its origins in the “radical” movement started by Saul Alinsky.

Obama, of course, was an Alinsky disciple. The Chicago Annenberg Challenge comes in here.

Bill raised money to start the Small Schools Workshop in the early 90s and eventually hired another former maoist from the 60s (and actually someone who was a bitter opponent of Ayers as SDS disintegrated) named Mike Klonsky first as research director and then to head it up. Klonsky was a PhD student at UIC studying under Ayers. Obama would approved grants of hundreds of thousands of dollars to the Workshop from the Chicago Annenberg Challenge. [Bill’s brother John later got in on the small schools approach also, raising money in part from the Annenberg Challenge program started by Bill and chaired by Obama

Klonsky was the Obama web site blogger who was suddenly fired when his Weather Underground connections were revealed. He was driving a taxi when Ayres steered a large grant to him to start the Small Schools Workshop. The Annenberg money seems to have been distributed among this network of old-time radicals.

In the fall of 1988, however, Obama left the city to go off to law school. My best guess, though, is that it was in that 86-88 time frame that Obama likely met up with the Ayers family. I will explain why I believe that in a minute. Interestingly, after his first year in law school Obama returned in the summer of 1989 to work as a summer associate at the prestigious Chicago law firm of Sidley & Austin. This in and of itself is a bit unusual. Very few top tier law students work for big law firms during their first summer. The big law firms discourage it because if you work for them in the first summer you are likely to work for a second firm the following year and then the firms have to compete to get you.

So, why or how did Obama – at that point not yet the prominent first black president of the Harvard Law Review (that would happen the following year) – end up at Sidley?

There is also quite a bit of interest in how Obama was admitted to Harvard Law School in the first place. He did not graduate with honors from Columbia. Rashid Khalidi may have played a role here. Obama also seems to have been close to Edward Said, former chief of the Middle East Studies department at Columbia that Khalidi now heads. There is even speculation that the Palestinians are more important in the Obama career than has been apparent thus far. Of course, the association is innocent. He says so.

His kids went to the Lab school where my kids go as well. He is a respected scholar, although he vehemently disagrees with a lot of Israel’s policy.”

Obama’s kids have some peculiar associations in school, I guess.

He has some other peculiar friends, too.

Anyway, we learn more about this, hopefully before the election. If not, eventually. Sigh.

Another memory hole

Friday, October 10th, 2008

This video was posted on You Tube and then linked at Hugh Hewitt’s blog. Within an hour, the video was listed as “no longer available” at You Tube. You Tube cannot be trusted to deal fairly with political material, unless, of course, it supports Obama.

I looked at the video at Politico, which still has it up, and thought it nothing special. Just more about Obama’s slimy friends. I guess this is what we have to look forward to in an Obama presidency.

The Ministry of Truth. Twenty five years late.

Obama and education

Thursday, October 9th, 2008

The Ayres story is less about Obama’s personal friends and their backgrounds than about his education plans for his presidency. Obama’s web site seems to list his education priorities. It includes child care to the infant level:

Zero to Five Plan: The Obama-Biden comprehensive “Zero to Five” plan will provide critical support to young children and their parents. Unlike other early childhood education plans, the Obama-Biden plan places key emphasis at early care and education for infants, which is essential for children to be ready to enter kindergarten. Obama and Biden will create Early Learning Challenge Grants to promote state “zero to five” efforts and help states move toward voluntary, universal pre-school.

There is research showing damage to small children from very early day care. One thinks of Romanian nurseries filled with near-autistic children deprived of maternal nurturing. It seems that Obama is committed to the use of early day care, even for infants.

They would go back to bilingual education, even though it has been shown to worsen school outcomes.

Support English Language Learners: Obama and Biden support transitional bilingual education and will help Limited English Proficient students get ahead by holding schools accountable for making sure these students complete school.

The rest is mostly the usual ed school blather. What about his real agenda ?

Well, we could listen to his friend Ayres, a “progressive school reformer.”

November 2006 at the World Education Forum in Caracas hosted by dictator Hugo Chavez.
With Chavez at his side, Ayers voiced his support for “the political educational reforms under way here in Venezuela under the leadership of President Chavez. We share the belief that education is the motor-force of revolution. . . . I look forward to seeing how . . . all of you continue to overcome the failures of capitalist education as you seek to create something truly new and deeply humane.”
Ayers told the great humanitarian Chavez: “Teaching invites transformations, it urges revolutions large and small. La educacion es revolucion.” It is that form of socialist revolution that Ayers, and Obama, have worked to bring to America.

Ayres is a major figure in the Daley empire of Chicago.

Chicago’s current mayor, Richard M. Daley, has employed Ayers as a teacher trainer for Chicago’s public schools and consulted him on the city’s education-reform plans.
Just last month, Ayers was elected vice-president for curriculum for the 25,000-member American Educational Research Association. AERA is the nation’s largest organization of education-school professors and researchers.
In a recent interview on Fox News’ “The O’Reilly Factor,” Obama upgraded Ayers’ status from “a guy who lives in my neighborhood” to “somebody who worked on education issues in Chicago that I know.”
Actually, Obama knew him quite well, having worked together on a school “reform” project called the Chicago Annenberg Challenge.
In the 1990s, Ayers was instrumental in starting the Annenberg Challenge, securing a $50 million grant to reform the Chicago Public Schools, part of a national initiative funded by the late Ambassador Walter Annenberg.
Obama was given the Annenberg board chairmanship only months before his first run for office. He ran the fiscal arm that distributed grants to schools and raised matching funds.
Ayers participated in a second entity known as the Chicago School Reform Collaborative, the operational arm that worked with grant recipients.
During Obama’s tenure as Annenberg board chairman, Ayers’ own education projects received substantial funding.
One of Ayers’ descriptions for a course called “Improving Learning Environments” says a prospective K-12 teacher needs to “be aware of the social and moral universe we inhabit and . . . be a teacher capable of hope and struggle, outrage and action, teaching for social justice and liberation.”

Sol Stern has some thoughts.

Obama is a dangerous man and his education background shows his Marxist economics are not necessarily the worst threat.

A catastrophic decision.

Monday, August 25th, 2008

Every once in a while, someone, in this case a candidate, makes a catastrophic decision, an “unforced error.” This seems to be one such occasion.

The ad is here. It says, “Barack Obama denounced William Ayres crimes.” The trouble is that he didn’t. Mayor Daley says Bill Ayres is a member of the “mainstream community.” In fact, he was Citizen of the Year in Chicago.

Ayers is still looking for that new symbol of hope to replace his old flags and signs. He could do a lot worse than to start with a photograph of him taken in 1997. It shows Ayers accepting Chicago’s Citizen of the Year award after securing the city a $49.2 million Annenberg Award for school reform.

“Makes you Citizen of the Year just like that,” Ayers says of the hefty grant, laughing. Shaking his hand in the photo is Mayor Daley — the new one, whose dad’s police treated Ayers so inhospitably all those years ago.

What did Bill Ayres’ father, a powerful and rich Democrat with connections to the Daley regime, want?

Of course, Tom Ayers was never going to run for mayor himself and clearly that was not possible for his son Bill. But what about the young charismatic Barack Obama? As I have suggested in earlier posts here it is possible that Tom Ayers served as a mentor to the young Obama as far back as the time Obama spent as a community organizer on the south side of Chicago not far from Tom Ayers’ home in Hyde Park. Obama biographer David Mendell writes that Obama “had returned to Chicago from Harvard Law with an eye on the mayor’s office after witnessing Harold Washington’s historic tenure at city hall.”

Tomorrow is the day that Steve Diamond and Stanley Kurtz find out what is in the Chicago Annenberg Challenge records.

For Obama to have opened this door for the MSM on the Ayres issue was an unforced eror and maybe a catastrophe.

Obama/Ayres is all coming out now.

Friday, August 22nd, 2008

First, we need to know why Ayres was an Education professor. Now we know. At least we know part of it.

Ayers’s spectacular second act began when he enrolled at Columbia University’s Teachers College in 1984. Then 40, he planned to stay just to get a teaching credential. (He had taught in a “Freedom School” during his pre-underground student radical days.) But he experienced an epiphany in a course taught by Maxine Greene, a leading light of the “critical pedagogy” movement. As Ayers wrote later, he took fire from Greene’s lectures on how the “oppressive hegemony” of the capitalist social order “reproduces” itself through the traditional practice of public schooling—critical pedagogy’s fancy way of saying that the evil corporations exercise thought control through the schools.

What is the purpose of his Education career ? His position as a Professor of Education?

Future teachers signing up for Ayers’s course “On Urban Education” can read these exhortations from the course description on the professor’s website:

“Homelessness, crime, racism, oppression—we have the resources and knowledge to fight and overcome these things.”

“We need to look beyond our isolated situations, to define our problems globally. We cannot be child advocates . . . in Chicago or New York and ignore the web that links us with the children of India or Palestine.”

“In a truly just society there would be a greater sharing of the burden, a fairer distribution of material and human resources.”

For another course, titled “Improving Learning Environments,” Ayers proposes that teachers “be aware of the social and moral universe we inhabit and . . . be a teacher capable of hope and struggle, outrage and action, a teacher teaching for social justice and liberation.”

For students who might get bored with the purely pedagogic approach to liberation, Ayers also offers a course on the real thing, called “Social Conflicts of the 1960’s.” For this class Ayers also posts his introduction to the soon-to-be-published collection of Weather Underground agitprop that he edited with Dohrn—called, with no intended parody, Sing a Battle Song: The Revolutionary Poetry, Statements and Communiqués of the Weather Underground, 1970-1974. “Once things were connected,” Ayers’s introduction recollects, “we saw a system at work, we were radicalized, we named that system—imperialism—and forged an idea of how to overthrow it. We were influenced by Marx, but we were formed more closely and precisely by Che, Ho, Malcolm X, Amílcar Cabral, Mandela—the Third World revolutionaries—and we called ourselves small ‘c’ communists to indicate our rejection of what had become of Marx in the Soviet Block [sic]. . . . We were anti-authoritarian, anti-orthodoxy, communist street fighters.”

How long after Obama’s inauguration do you think it would be before Ayres is named Secretary of Education ?

No wonder the SAT scores have been falling.

How should teachers teach science, for example? According to one of the books, Ayers and Greene approved for publishing,

“The marriages between capitalism and education and capitalism and science have created a foundation for science education that emphasizes corporate values at the expense of social justice and human dignity.” The alternative? “Science pedagogy framed around social justice concerns can become a medium to transform individuals, schools, communities, the environment, and science itself, in ways that promote equity and social justice. Creating a science education that is transformative implies not only how science is a political activity but also the ways in which students might see and use science and science education in ways transformative of the institutional and interpersonal power structures that play a role in their lives.”

And we thought that science was still safe !

Well. don’t lose hope. Next week, the CAC records are supposed to be available.

We”ll see.

Obama and Ayres

Wednesday, August 20th, 2008

UPDATE # 6: Michael Barone adds his comments on the Obama/Ayres story and adds a bit of Chicago color.

UPDATE #4: Drip, drip, drip. A day of reckoning is coming. Maybe we’ll even learn how Ayres got away with his crimes. On the other hand, “Da Mayor” isn’t having any. I don’t know if stone walls are as strong as they were in the old days of 1968 but we might find out this fall.

At least the LA Times, in trying to defend Obama shows a nice photo of Ayres and the American flag.

UPDATE # 3 The Ayres records are starting to hit the MSM.

Drip, drip drip.

UPDATE #3 The McCain campaign is pounding on this topic now. Maybe the New York Times will discover it by November 9.

UPDATE #2: Here is more on the Chicago Annenberg Challenge and the roles of Ayres and Obama. A sample:

As Ayers stated in a speech there in November 2006 “La educacion es Revolucion!” He applauded “the profound educational reforms underway here in Venezuela under the leadership of President Chavez” and he said he “share[d] the belief that education is the motor-force of revolution.”

When the LSC reform was put in place Bill Ayers wrote an opinion piece for the Chicago newspapers that spoke of combatting the “bureaucracies” that he felt blocked true reform in the school system. I believe he meant by this both the Chicago school board and the Chicago Teachers’ Union. This use of the word “bureaucracies” as his target is, again, evocative of the attempts of figures like Mao Tse Tung to combat “bureaucracy” in the Chinese cultural revolution.

Whoops !

UPDATE: There are more cover-ups going on than the one at U of Illinois. The cover-up is always worse than the crime. Don’t these people know that ? John Edwards should have taught them this just a couple of weeks ago. Maybe there is something really juicy in there.

This may explain why I ran into a smaller version of the door in the face from a university recently. As Global Labor readers know I laid out the basic trajectory of the CAC through a review of the CAC’s financial statements, board minutes and annual and semi-annual reports, provided to me by Brown University, which housed the original national Annenberg Challenge. Once I posted my first discussion of what I found in these records, I sent additional requests for information to Brown.

However, while the representative from the university I originally corresponded with had been quite friendly and accommodating prior to my June 23 post, afterwards my additional requests for further information went unanswered. I did not pursue it at the time because I felt I had told a significant part of the story already. Thanks to the diligent work of Dr. Kurtz, however, we now know there is much more to know.

Oh Oh !

The Obama/Ayres story is starting to leak out in spite of the best efforts of the university of Illinois at Chicago. When Obama was first asked about Ayres, he said he was “a guy who lives in my neighborhood and our kids went to the same school.” In fact, Ayres has been a “mentor” to Obama and their children are nowhere close in age. Ayres children are grown and Obama’s are not yet teenagers. Bill Ayres and his wife, Bernadine Dohrn, were members of the Weather Underground, an even more violent branch of the 60s radical group “The Weathemen.” They set off bombs and were fugitives until the 1980s. Ayres, whose father is rich and influential in Chicago, got off scot free on a technical violation by the FBI who wiretapped his group. Dohrn was convicted of a felony. For that reason, she cannot get a bar card in Illnois but that has not stopped Northwestern University from making her an Associate Professor of Law. If your parents are rich enough, they can protect you from any consequences, as long as your criminal acts were committed in “Progressive causes.”

These are Obama’s friends and this is why access to the records of the Chicago Annenberg Challenge is being blocked. Who knows what might be in there. We know the challenge failed to improve Chicago schools. We know that Ayres steered grants to radical associates, one of whom was driving a taxi at the time he got the grant. We just don’t know what there is about Obama.

We do know that Mike Klonsky, the “professor” and ex-taxi driver, was a blogger on the Obama campaign web site until his past (and present) were discovered. He quickly disappeared once that was discovered. Obama has all sorts of radical friends. Like ACORN, for example.

I wonder why ?