Posts Tagged ‘ANWR’

Democrats stand athwart history saying STOP!

Friday, July 11th, 2008

UPDATE: Senator Cornyn agrees and plans to make this a focus of the fall campaign.

The present crisis in oil and gasoline prices may be aggravated by speculation in the futures market but the principle factor is supply and demand. China and India are industrializing, a process that will only accelerate in the next decades, and their oil consumption is rising. Alternate energy sources must be developed. Nuclear power has been blocked from expansion by a weird combination of aging 1950s era ban-the-bomb activists

President Bush is promoting the use of nuclear power plants to generate electricity. It seems a political choice. Investing in nuclear power plants can be attempted only by very large corporations, of the kind that are in his support base. They belong to a very exclusive big-money club, and there are many billions of dollars at stake. But to belong, one also has to be willing to forget Three Mile Island, to forget market economics, nuclear proliferation, radioactive waste and, in particular, to forget nuclear terrorism.

and environmentalists who would prefer that much of the world’s human population die off quietly.

We must also work to slow population growth by increasing access to voluntary family planning and reproductive health programs so that families are better able to choose the number and spacing of their children. The Sierra Club’s Global Population and Environment Program supports efforts to empower women and families through education about responsible reproductive health and natural resource use— vital components of the global goal to secure a healthier environmental future.

The Congressional Democrats seem to be determined to obstruct any attempt to increase oil production domestically in spite of possible serious consequences at the polls this fall.

“This call for drilling in areas that are protected is a hoax,” Ms. Pelosi said. “It’s an absolute hoax on the part of the Republicans and this Bush administration.”

I hope John McCain is flexible enough and quick enough to use this issue to change the dynamic of the Congressional elections. With Congress’ approval rating at 9%, the entire theme of the 2008 elections, massive defeat for Republicans, may not be inevitable.

It’s late to start drilling. Maybe

Thursday, June 19th, 2008

Bill Clinton vetoed ANWR drilling in 1996 saying that it would not produce any oil for ten years ! Guess what ? That was 12 years ago. The political left has the usual weak response to this argument. This Wikipedia entry has the usual environmentalist slant that mars its otherwise useful role, but it contains this summary:

In 1987, Canada and the U.S. signed the Agreement on the Conservation of the Porcupine Caribou Herd treaty which was designed to protect the herd and its habitat from damage or disruptions in migration routes. Canada’s Ivvavik National Park and Vuntut National Park borders the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge. Energy Bill authorized drilling in ANWR, but a filibuster by Senate Democrats kept the measure from coming to a vote. In 1995, Republicans prepared to take up the battle again and included a provision for ANWR in the federal budget. President Bill Clinton vetoed the entire budget and expressed his intention to veto any other bill that would open ANWR to drilling.

I’d say that establishes the responsibility pretty well. Why is this important ? Aside from $4.59 gasoline, I mean ?

Well, Brazil has discovered a massive oil field in deep water off its coast. It has leased all the deep water drill rigs in the world for the next five to seven years.

There are no more drilling ships to be had, and it will take years to build them. Now, it doesn’t take deep water rigs to drill in ANWR. Nor are they necessary for the tar sands and oil shale of the Rocky Mountains which contain massive reserves.

But it is time to drill. Although it is very late.

The politics will be very interesting to watch. Democrats are opposed to any carbon use so they oppose any drilling. Bill Clinton created a national monument to prevent coal development but, as is usual with Bill, nobody knows if this was simple corruption or more Democrat anti-carbon politics.